Hi, please let me add that posting a comment and - if possible - a proposal to the list is the fastest way to move things forward. This way everybody else in the TC (e.g. those interested in OOo) can pick it up and help getting this into the standard.
If you wait for someone else doing this, e.g. a Sun developer that got the issues assigned to, it will take much longer as a legal review is necessary before this can happen (we can't take over suggestions from others and bring them to the list without checking the situation wrt. intellectual properties). This is a good opportunity to contribute and make a difference. Regards, Mathias Peter Junge wrote: > Hi Kirill, > > I will not have the time to take action on these issues myself, but I > would like to briefly summarize how you (and of course others) can get > heard by the OASIS ODF TC. > > For each standards TC, OASIS is offering a public comment list and they > have a policy, that each comment submitted must be tracked. I am a > member of the ODF TC for only six month now, but so far the process > seems to work, hence I can recommend using the list. As there are some > policies to consider, please have a look at [1] to learn about it and > also find the information for subscribing to the mailing list there. > > Your comment to the ODF list can be just like the original mail, but I > would recommend to add some information like name, contact, application > (e.g. text, spreadsheet or presentation), category (formatting in your > case) and a brief use case. > > If you or anyone else would like to invest more time, you might consider > to submit a complete proposal. A proposal template you can find at [2], > examples are available at [3]. > Please refer the ODF TC wiki for more information [4]. > > Best regards, > Peter > > [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=office > [2] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/ProposalTemplate > [3] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/List_of_Proposals > [4] http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office > > > Kirill S. Palagin wrote: >> Hello everybody. >> >> We have highly desired issues >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5560 and >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8275 , which require >> amendments for ODF specification. Issue 5560 is even implemented in >> code. >> So could somebody, who is member of OASIS ODF committee, introduce these >> two proposals for next version of ODF? >> >> TIA. >> WBR, >> KP. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[email protected]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
