Hi, most of you might be aware of the discussion about ODF-icons which is very controversal at the moment.
I don't want to go into this discussion again, but this issue showed, how important the "ODF-Story" is and that many people around take this serious. While doing translations for OOo 3.2 I just came across, that we introduced a "ODF 1.2 *extended*" file format in OOo. From a technical point of view I have some ideas, why this is usefull and needed. But from a users POV, this is rather puzzling. At the one hand we try to promote ODF as standard - we even go that far to introduce venodr independet icons for ODF files (as we want to show, that ODF is ODF, no matter what application you use). At the other hand, we now have three flavours of ODF in OOo and none of these is the ISO standard (what is ODF 1.0). What standard ist this, where you need to change version recommendations even if you upgrade from one minor application version to the next? I think, we should be more carefull with this. André -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
