On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:43:29 +0100 Malte Timmermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> -1 for discussing here whether or not QA should use non-pros, because > it IMHO has absolutely no influence on how assertions should behave. > And if you want QA to use non-pros, they for sure would give up quite > soon when assertions always abort. With assertions being assertions and "give up" meaning reporting it, thats exactly the desired behavior. Current situation: - assertions might be anything from a informal "I didnt expect this external data" to a critical "internal state corrupt" Desired situation: - assertions are only "internal state corrupt" messages and should abort - everything else is tracing, logging For example, Frank is claiming his asserts are all serious issues and thus shouldnt be "degraded" to mere traces. So keeping "his" asserts as assertions, even if they abort should not scare anyone, right? Best Regards, Bjoern --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
