On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If you could find this patch, it will be very useful.
Should we create the new class which replace the "SvArray" (it will be used STL)
or just replace all SvArray to STL directly?
I think the first idea is better to maintenance (but it is a little bit harder
to implement),
the second idea is a little bit harder to implement, and it will be difficult
to add some new features to all new arrays.
Best Regards
Bartosz
Changing out SvArray, will fix this long standing bug, which will bring
great joy and happiness to my life.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
