Hi Björn, >> If so, I think this is not a good idea at all: Consider modules such >> as toolkit, svtools and svx, where there is a more or less complex >> (well, let's say: well-arranged and -readable) folder structure below >> the module's include folder. Putting all those files into the flat >> <module>/inc/<module> folder will certainly not contribute to the >> readability of the source tree. > > Why would you want to put them into a _flat_ structure?
I don't want to. My understanding was it was required to, in the GNU make build system. > Also note that > from the named modules toolkit and svtools are already migrated to the > new builds system. Just have a look at cws gnumake2. Uhm. You see me confused. The trigger of this question was a call from releng, which told me that in svtools, the content of svtools/inc/svtools/toolpanel had to be moved to svtools/inc/svtools, 'cause of the new build system, which would not support such sub folders ... Ciao Frank --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
