On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 05:28:24PM +0200, rony wrote: > It is almost crazy, because quite a few projects rely on unoinfo > supplying the correct CLASSPATH definition for interacting with OOo/LO > (the sequence matters), which then simply won't work with the Ubuntu > distros.
And where should this mysterious unoinfo.sh be? In OOo? In LibO? No. If it was it would be installed by the installer. If it isn't that's a bug per se in the installer/scp2, and not in the packaging. We (Debian) dont do anything special here. Ah, I see: ene@frodo:~/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice-3.3.3/build$ find . -name "unoinfo*" ./desktop/scripts/unoinfo.sh ./desktop/unxlngx6.pro/misc/unoinfo.sh ./desktop/win32/source/unoinfo.cxx ./solver/330/unxlngx6.pro/bin/unoinfo So unoinfo.sh gets unoinfo and gets installed here (like with soffice etc.) rene@frodo:~$ find /usr/lib/libreoffice/ -name "unoinfo*" /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo rene@frodo:~$ less /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/unoinfo in Debian, is that what you mean? If yes, then it's interesting why Ubuntu doesn't package it, yes. If not, there's nothing either Debian or Ubuntu broke. Grüße/Regards, René -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands send email to sy...@openoffice.org with Subject: help
