In miniops, if this is done via the operator your don't use the standalone, but the regular controller in standalone mode I believe. Just check the version of the pod image and you will see it it the same of the regular controller.
Anyway, the openserverless-builds also the standalone. On 2026/05/01 19:29:22 Michele Sciabarra wrote: > That is great! A question, is the standalone also built? We use it in the > miniops and we need that too... > Unless we can instead go with the standard controller with an appropriate > configuration. > > Michele Sciabarra | CEO > > m: +44 747 984 8388 > e: [email protected] > l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab > Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street, 19801Wilmington DE - US > www.nuvolaris.io linkedin.com/in/msciab > > > On Fri, 1 May 2026 at 20:27, Francesco Timperi Tiberi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Michele, > > > > Briefly, the OpenWhisk 2 images I built are these: > > > > registry.hub.docker.com/apache/openserverless-wsk-controller > > registry.hub.docker.com/apache/openserverless-wsk-invoker > > > > both with the same tag: 2.0.0-incubating.2512132233 > > > > Since these are OpenWhisk 2 images, they expect the scheduler to be > > present as well (which does exist with the same tag). > > > > However, the openserverless-operator does not deploy the scheduler. > > > > I created this PR on the operator project > > https://github.com/apache/openserverless-operator/pull/80, which shows > > how to use OpenWhisk 2 images in an OpenWhisk 1–style mode (let’s call it > > that), and also fixes a couple of bugs related to the controller and > > invoker image versions when they are specified in the wsk file. > > > > To reproduce the build, you need to use the project > > https://github.com/apache/openserverless-build, but: > > > > This PR must be accepted in the OpenWhisk project > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5565, which updates the version > > of the Zookeeper dependencies. > > > > Without it, OpenWhisk 2 images in controller+invoker mode are not working. > > Nobody has paid attention to it, but you should be able to approve it. I > > suspect that since everyone is using version 2 with the scheduler, the > > Zookeeper issue hasn’t surfaced. > > > > Once the PR in OpenWhisk is accepted, you just need to align the openwhisk > > submodule in the openserverless-build project. The GitHub Action that > > performs the build is triggered as usual by a tag. > > > > There is also a devcontainer and a Taskfile with the relevant commands to > > build the images locally. > > > > The current images I used were built and tested from my forks of the three > > projects. My user is authorized to push to Docker under Apache, which is > > why they are already there. > > > > On 2026/05/01 18:36:26 Michele Sciabarra wrote: > > > Hello everyone next step is to build from sources the Operator and the > > > OpenWhisk components. I remember Francesco worked on it, can you please > > > write your recommendations? > > > > > > > > > Michele Sciabarra | CEO > > > > > > m: +44 747 984 8388 > > > e: [email protected] > > > l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab > > > Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street, 19801Wilmington DE - US > > > www.nuvolaris.io linkedin.com/in/msciab > > > > > >
