Interesting! So the "standalone" image is not used at all currently?
I thought it was because I built it in the old days of Nuvolaris Community. Michele Sciabarra | CEO m: +44 747 984 8388 e: [email protected] l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street, 19801Wilmington DE - US www.nuvolaris.io linkedin.com/in/msciab On Fri, 1 May 2026 at 20:38, Francesco Timperi Tiberi <[email protected]> wrote: > In miniops, if this is done via the operator your don't use the > standalone, but the regular controller in standalone mode I believe. Just > check the version of the pod image and you will see it it the same of the > regular controller. > > Anyway, the openserverless-builds also the standalone. > > On 2026/05/01 19:29:22 Michele Sciabarra wrote: > > That is great! A question, is the standalone also built? We use it in the > > miniops and we need that too... > > Unless we can instead go with the standard controller with an appropriate > > configuration. > > > > Michele Sciabarra | CEO > > > > m: +44 747 984 8388 > > e: [email protected] > > l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab > > Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street, 19801Wilmington DE - US > > www.nuvolaris.io linkedin.com/in/msciab > > > > > > On Fri, 1 May 2026 at 20:27, Francesco Timperi Tiberi < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Michele, > > > > > > Briefly, the OpenWhisk 2 images I built are these: > > > > > > registry.hub.docker.com/apache/openserverless-wsk-controller > > > registry.hub.docker.com/apache/openserverless-wsk-invoker > > > > > > both with the same tag: 2.0.0-incubating.2512132233 > > > > > > Since these are OpenWhisk 2 images, they expect the scheduler to be > > > present as well (which does exist with the same tag). > > > > > > However, the openserverless-operator does not deploy the scheduler. > > > > > > I created this PR on the operator project > > > https://github.com/apache/openserverless-operator/pull/80, which shows > > > how to use OpenWhisk 2 images in an OpenWhisk 1–style mode (let’s call > it > > > that), and also fixes a couple of bugs related to the controller and > > > invoker image versions when they are specified in the wsk file. > > > > > > To reproduce the build, you need to use the project > > > https://github.com/apache/openserverless-build, but: > > > > > > This PR must be accepted in the OpenWhisk project > > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5565, which updates the > version > > > of the Zookeeper dependencies. > > > > > > Without it, OpenWhisk 2 images in controller+invoker mode are not > working. > > > Nobody has paid attention to it, but you should be able to approve it. > I > > > suspect that since everyone is using version 2 with the scheduler, the > > > Zookeeper issue hasn’t surfaced. > > > > > > Once the PR in OpenWhisk is accepted, you just need to align the > openwhisk > > > submodule in the openserverless-build project. The GitHub Action that > > > performs the build is triggered as usual by a tag. > > > > > > There is also a devcontainer and a Taskfile with the relevant commands > to > > > build the images locally. > > > > > > The current images I used were built and tested from my forks of the > three > > > projects. My user is authorized to push to Docker under Apache, which > is > > > why they are already there. > > > > > > On 2026/05/01 18:36:26 Michele Sciabarra wrote: > > > > Hello everyone next step is to build from sources the Operator and > the > > > > OpenWhisk components. I remember Francesco worked on it, can you > please > > > > write your recommendations? > > > > > > > > > > > > Michele Sciabarra | CEO > > > > > > > > m: +44 747 984 8388 > > > > e: [email protected] > > > > l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab > > > > Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street, 19801Wilmington DE - US > > > > www.nuvolaris.io linkedin.com/in/msciab > > > > > > > > > >
