On 6 May 2008, at 10:33, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > SteveC wrote: > >> I disagree, publicise widely and just switch. It's worked every time >> in the past. It's not _entirely_ clear that it's possible to run >> both, >> and in the past it certainly hasn't been such as the dropping of >> segments. >> >> The only think I have a problem with is backward supporting the crap >> in potlatch. > > No-one has ever needed to add "backward supporting" code for Potlatch > anywhere, whether on 0.4 or 0.5, and there's no question of them doing > so this time, either. You may not like the internals and I can > understand that, but Potlatch always tries to play nice. With 0.6, as > with 0.5, the main API is actually moving slightly closer to the way > Potlatch has always done things _anyway_.
well thats the point, you're going to reimplement everything in an unmaintainable way in the RichardAPI unless I can stop you > Ah, the bullets you have to take for being ahead of the curve. :p > > But to be a bit more helpful: > >> is there anything else that should be put in 0.6? Probably a good >> idea to talk about it now. > > Well, ideally it'd be good to add > > PUT /api/0.6/way/123456/full > to do the same thing as Potlatch's 'putway' call, and then migrate the > latter to use the same methods. oh I thought I did that Best Steve _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
