El Martes, 6 de Mayo de 2008, Karl Newman escribió: > Sorry, but I think graph-edge relationships would be a step backwards for > our mappers. It may be nice and technologically advanced, but we already > have problems with mappers understanding the clockwise/counterclockwise > rules; do you think they're going to understand graph-edge relationships?
Heck, I don't even understand how to make a relationship for an area with holes myself! Really, I'm aiming at simplifying landuse data and political boundaries, from big data imports. I think I had some nightmares importing the landuse data from Naga City and this whole idea as a result. Watching the JOSM validator tag *all* landuse data as overlapping just doesn't seem right. > If you can make the tools such that the underlying data model is > transparent to the user/mapper, then great (maybe), otherwise... Only complex areas with long adjacent boundaries would be affected. The standard mapper/user wouldn't need to learn anything new. I'm also assuming that any user that can use JOSM and the validator effectively shouldn't have much problems working with relations. Cheers, -- ---------------------------------- Iván Sánchez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Proudly running Debian Linux with 2.6.24-1-amd64 kernel, KDE 3.5.9, and PHP 5.2.5-3 generating this signature. Uptime: 22:19:59 up 6 days, 1:40, 2 users, load average: 0.03, 0.10, 0.18
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
