On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 09:55:22PM -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote: > It looks like the main API and Potlatch have different ideas of what > should be done when a node is deleted which is a member of a way or > relation. Potlatch deletes the node from any way or relation that it is > a member of: the main API just rejects the edit. > > To consolidate these a bit, might it make sense to take a 'force > deletion' parameter in the API which says 'delete this node from any way > which it is a member of and remove it from any relations which it is a > member of'? This would likely be added as a parameter to the 'delete' > method of the node_controller, and then added as a parameter to the > 'delete_with_history' api call... > > I think that if this happened, the 'deleteitemrelations' code in > amf_controller could be migrated away from... > > Thoughts?
What happens if this is the last node of the relationship or the second to last of the way? Does the delete cascade? cu bart _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
