In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:29:23AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > It looks like the main API and Potlatch have different ideas of what
>> > should be done when a node is deleted which is a member of a way or
>> > relation. Potlatch deletes the node from any way or relation that it is
>> > a member of: the main API just rejects the edit.
>>
>> It's more complicated than that. The main API expects the client
>> to do all the work and send individual instructions for each object
>> while the Potlatch API is sent a complete definition of a way with
>> all the node locations and is expected to work out which nodes need
>> to be moved, created and deleted and to do all the work.
>
> This is a question about deleting nodes, not ways. I understand that
> ways are more complex.
I wasn't aware that Potlatch was able to delete a node that was part
of a way other than by doing putway and changing the whole way... Are
you saying that I'm wrong?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
