Frederik Ramm wrote: > We could do rollback even now without any grouping
(We do!) > [...] > This collapsing would have to be implemented in every piece of software > that deals with changesets, and my hunch is that everybody would > implement it slightly differently. Out of interest, why's that a bad thing? We have several editors, for example: each of them works differently and presents information differently. Why do we have to have One True Rollback? I can foresee ways in which different "collapsing" methods could be of benefit - for example, one rollback tool might want to visualise (via animation) consecutive edits within a particular changeset to see what the user was doing. cheers Richard _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
