-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Frederik Ramm schrieb: > Hi, > If you are really interested in that kind of detail, load individual > object histories or the minutely change files. A changeset, to me, > should be like an SVN commit: I check stuff out, then I make umpteen > edits using my favourite editor, then I check stuff in with a commit > message. A changeset is *not* intended to be a video recording of what > happened on the user's desktop between point A and point B.
should it be as SVN in the way that the moment I touch an object in an open changeset, it is locked, so my changeset can be committed as an atom? Or seen from the other side, how do you rollback "meshed" changesets? for example User A creates node 1, version 1, then B edits the tags (->version 2), then User A moves it, and changes some tags (-> version 3) then both close their changesets. - -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFILGpWFUbODdpRVDwRAtooAJ9seuA98x7faxrvrsmqPRLTFCbbDQCfRHHu O4/tmP5tBgFggMwSuSZiXtM= =A9cV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
