On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > * when a diff contains 6 changes and the 3th has a problem (outdated >> > version number), >> > will change 1 and 2 happen? Will change 4, 5 and 6 happen if they are not >> > problematic? >> >> Nope, the whole point is that its atomic. Either it all works, or none >> of it does. > > Is this actually the way it is implemented? The code doesn't read that > way to me...
It's implemented? Without transaction you have to provide a way of telling people what failed and why and pass back the ID of created objects. Transactions are less work. In theory it should be just: 1. Request received open transaction 2. Process commands 3. On error, abort else commit I can imagine the indivudual bits of code don't know they're running in a transaction. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
