In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:09:15AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
>> It's implemented? Without transaction you have to provide a way of
>> telling people what failed and why and pass back the ID of created
>> objects. Transactions are less work. In theory it should be just:
>>
>> 1. Request received open transaction
>> 2. Process commands
>> 3. On error, abort else commit
>>
>> I can imagine the indivudual bits of code don't know they're running
>> in a transaction.
>
> Right, the code doesn't seem to do anything on abort... at least, not
> that I can see...
Is the whole thing not wrapped in a transaction?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
