Wolschon Softwaredesign und Beratung wrote: > On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:31:04 +0200, Jochen Topf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I propose to not modify ways by default and to remove the way-id of >>> ways that are modified during extraction. >>> What should a tool care if the way references node-ids that it has >>> no nodes for because they are outside the bounding-box? It has to ignore >>> them. >>> >>> The removal of the ID is because this is no longer the way with >>> that ID but a new and artificially created way that contains a part >>> of the original one. >>> > ... > >> There is another option, I want to bring into the discussion: In the >> case of the Osmosis extract we could keep the node list, but not include >> the nodes itself. This would keep the way object intact for the price of >> breaking referential integrity. This is the solution employed for >> relations, which are not resolved recursively (or only to a certain >> degree). This way we don't have to make objects incomplete. Still >> wouldn't solve the imcomplete tag thing. >> > > That is exactly what I proposed with "not modify ways" and is also > what I do in Traveling Salesman when working with much less then a > whole planet for routing. > > Marcus > Yeah, it's also what I meant when I said I was planning to change osmosis to not mangle ways by default. I didn't mean switch to the --bounding-box completeWays=true functionality because that is not scalable to large data sets.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
