On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Brett Henderson wrote: >> >>> Would this mean you'd update the same way multiple times within a >>> single revision? I'm nervous about what this means for >>> replication. How does osmosis know when the way is complete and >>> ready to be replicated? Sorry, probably off topic here but just >>> keep it in mind. >> >> Not quite sure what you mean. 0.6 transactions will just be (AIUI) >> "groups" of edits, nothing more. > > Just a clarification for me - should we keep referring to these as > "changesets" and perhaps start the mantra of "a changeset is not > transactional"? I think otherwise the database guys amongst us will > get confused...
On reading the wiki, maybe "a changeset is not atomic" is a better description? Is there a difference in db-esque parlance between "atomic" and "transactional"? > Or explain to me if I've got the wrong end of the stick between > "changesets" and what you're describing. > > Cheers, > Andy > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
