On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Richard Fairhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Brett Henderson wrote: >>> >>>> Would this mean you'd update the same way multiple times within a >>>> single revision? I'm nervous about what this means for >>>> replication. How does osmosis know when the way is complete and >>>> ready to be replicated? Sorry, probably off topic here but just >>>> keep it in mind. >>> >>> Not quite sure what you mean. 0.6 transactions will just be (AIUI) >>> "groups" of edits, nothing more. >> >> Just a clarification for me - should we keep referring to these as >> "changesets" and perhaps start the mantra of "a changeset is not >> transactional"? I think otherwise the database guys amongst us will >> get confused... > > On reading the wiki, maybe "a changeset is not atomic" is a better > description? Is there a difference in db-esque parlance between > "atomic" and "transactional"?
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACID _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
