Hugh Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Sent: 09 October 2008 1:08 PM >To: [email protected] >Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) >Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] way 7062297, is this new? > >On Thursday 09 October 2008 18:56:42 Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) >wrote: >> Duplicate keys were perfectly valid >> then and indeed I recall we discussed how we might use duplication for >> tagging purposes. It was only the lack of support in the editors that >> stopped duplication in its tracks. > >OK, so sounds like the editors didn't share the vision here. What were some >of >the use cases you came up with? Do they still apply?
We are talking years ago now ;-) thus you won't be surprised I can't recall specific ideas. Maybe a trawl of the list would throw something up. But then again since it's been pointed out that only 35 current cases exist and I haven't seen a great clamouring for duplicate capability I suspect we can simply ignore and move on. Cheers Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
