especially for you, google invented 'mail goggles': http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-in-labs-stop-sending-mail-you-later.html
no seriously: stefan is a nice guy and he made a valid point here. i am also really amazed this is possible. but imo we should blame the api, not potlatch. greetings, floris Stefan de Konink schreef: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Andy Allan schreef: >> I'd suggest that you calm down a bit. This behaviour is fully >> supported by the API, so your assumption that {wayid,key} can be made >> a primary key is the problem. > > I had a nice dream about walking corpses in a theme park, so you can be > sure I am relaxed now ;) > > >> And stop reflexively blaming Potlatch, it's not cool to do so. > > It was the only edit in the Dutch data set that had this issue. > > > Frederik Ramm schreef: >> Writing to a foundation member about anything that concerns OSM >> operations is just plain stupid because the foundation has no say in >> things like protocol and data model. > > I was informed that the Foundation took care of issues that could be a > concern for OSM. I think this technical issue is a concern that can > degrade the value of edits in OSM, using an less restrictive editor. > >> But it is not >> something that requires immediate action. > > If 0.6 is not supporting it, it should not be possible to enter the data > today. (imho) > > Richard Fairhurst schreef: >> Stefan de Konink wrote: >> >>> Then disable *ANY* edits with this borked editor: "Potlatch 0.10c" and >>> revert back to a version that did not produce duplicates. >> >> Er, hate to rain on your parade, but if you'd actually have taken >> 0.00001us to look, you'd see that Potlatch 0.10c has already been >> superseded. >> > > Can I conclude that regression testing is something that should be > implemented for any editor? Or do you place the blame yourself at the > API that allows this, while any other editor will drop this? > >> Incidentally, we're all volunteers, "please" and "thank you" and "I >> beg from the depths of my heart" work a lot better than "I *DEMAND* >> you do *THIS* or I will *SHOOT* you oh and I'm telling *TEACHER* about >> you". > > Yes, and spending two hours of time to find out that some editor is > doing things that nothing has done before is a volunteer frustration. > (Writing email at 3am is too). > > > > I think we should fix this issues where there is so added value of > duplication soon. I'm happy to do it manually using one of my parsers, > does anyone has serious objections against it? > > > Stefan > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEAREKAAYFAkjuB6sACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3mDwCeNnBibRf1K1JI5gXnmK/nQw0Q > 0hkAn32TTiPpa3GPvHRIu17hJATRKviw > =F+ZQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev