Hello everyone,

I have to admit I haven't done much work on Freemap lately - other 
commitments being a big factor but an equally important factor  being that 
my server cannot cope well with an OSM database covering most of England.

So I was considering an alternative approach, in which Freemap no longer 
focuses on providing custom OSM maps for walkers, but rather uses the 
"standard" OSM maps (probably [EMAIL PROTECTED]/osmarender, as they distinguish 
between tracks with private and public access which is vital for walkers) 
and focuses instead on providing a separate and more lightweight data 
layer which allows walkers to report problems with paths, contribute 
directions in difficult places, photos, etc.

However this would obviously mean Freemap embedding [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 
informationfreeway.org maps in its own site. How acceptable would this be 
seen to be?

Thanks,
Nick

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to