2008/11/21 Nick Whitelegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello everyone, > > I have to admit I haven't done much work on Freemap lately - other > commitments being a big factor but an equally important factor being that > my server cannot cope well with an OSM database covering most of England. > > So I was considering an alternative approach, in which Freemap no longer > focuses on providing custom OSM maps for walkers, but rather uses the > "standard" OSM maps (probably [EMAIL PROTECTED]/osmarender, as they > distinguish > between tracks with private and public access which is vital for walkers) > and focuses instead on providing a separate and more lightweight data > layer which allows walkers to report problems with paths, contribute > directions in difficult places, photos, etc. > > However this would obviously mean Freemap embedding [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > informationfreeway.org maps in its own site. How acceptable would this be > seen to be? > > Thanks, > Nick
Perfectly fine, providing the standard OSM attribution. In fact, the OpenLayers definition[0] was produced so people could do this easily! [0] http://www.openstreetmap.org/openlayers/OpenStreetMap.js -- Regards, Thomas Wood (Edgemaster) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
