Dave Stubbs wrote: > There was a Potlatch bug early on (my fault), which has now been > fixed, that'll be responsible for referencing the low numbered nodes.
Resolvement scenario? Undelete or remove members? > The root of the problem, however (as has been stated many times > before), is lack of transactions and foreign key constraints in the > 0.5 API. > This is being fixed in the 0.6 API. Foreign key constraints are part of the typical database; not an API matter. If implemented it still wouldn't require transactions only a proper order of querying. But from someone that is a better expert than myself on MySQL nobody is fan of locking here? Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
