Tom Hughes wrote: > That would be a backward step - we have perfect synchronisation at the > moment so why move to a situation where you may get old data, even if > only a few minutes old?
Because your perfect synchronisation is in one place: London. Your users are all over the world. >>> + loss of control unless all proxy targets are maintained by >>> the OSM admin team >> >> The OSM admin team maintains the proxy. And targets get checked if >> they have the latest minutely's every hour -> if not, remove from pool. > > Absolutely not. That way leads to chaos. We know this from the [EMAIL > PROTECTED] proxy > experience where there was always at least one server that didn't seem > to be working. If not working; not in the pool? That is pretty trivial. Just an automatic script. >>>> What is the down time you expect for 0.6 migration? >>> >>> We are still attempting to quantify that. >> >> New server an option? > > Moving to a new database server is part of the migration plan. Then why would there be any serious downtime then? (Longer than 5 minutes to synchronise with the latest diff) Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
