Frederik Ramm wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: >> The latter still requires the same client/server modifications + >> modifications in all current node relations. Hence it will cost more >> time. > > No it doesn't; 99.9% of all ways don't violate the new criteria so all > tools will work perfectly for them.
The problem is the actual search for and modification of the violators. Like the current problem with ways/relation of size 0; invalid references etc. >> Even in 0.5 relations can be ordered using the type='...'. > > You're getting (more) ridiculous. > > What are you trying to prove here? That you're right and the rest is > wrong? That you are a masterful programmer and the others just dumb > fiddlers? Matt claimed it was impossible to do order in relations within API 0.5. That argument is wrong. That is the only thing I'm proving here. And I did make an error because I should talked about role instead of type. > You have meanwhile reached a point where I'd rather see the project go > down in flames than implement a single one of your ideas. Do it yourself > or go to hell. I am doing it myself, don't worry. And I don't get stopped by any flames on mailinglists :) Happy new year to you too :) Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
