Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> writes: > Matthias Julius wrote: >> ... but not a tree of relations. Every relation is a tree (almost). >> So I don't see a particular problem in making a boundary a relation, >> too. > > Some people wanted to limit ways/relations to 2k of nodes. If you do > allow relations to have all these extra subrelations then what are you > going to solve in the end? This is enforcing a clueless limit and not > solving the fundamental problem why this limit is justified; and no that > has nothing to do with data storage.
Not subrelations, but a relation with 2000 ways with 2000 nodes each. And no it has nothing to do with storage, only with data managable for users. > > As I mentioned earlier, there is no need for even the concept 'way'; > since you can store a relation with tag highway=whatever. So fundamental > issues: I think keeping ways as linear primitives is a good idea. Matthias _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
