Stefan Baebler wrote: > My previous patch probably conflicts with > http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/534 and > http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6562 > > which allows compressed (eg .gpx.gz) data usually served by > http://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/137465/data > to be served as uncompressed gpx xml if requested as > http://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/137465/data.xml > > Why .xml extension instead of simply .gpx?
Not sure to be honest. I probably just thought it was more likely that a client would do the right thing with .xml than with an extension it had probably never seen before (yes I know they should use the mime type, but it's not unheard of for them not to). > Can we link that in the trace detail page or is there a good reason for > not doing so? I don't want to encourage people to use the uncompressed version unless they have a good reason - it is really only there for potlatch. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://www.compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
