On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Brett Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: > > El Miércoles, 11 de Febrero de 2009, Shaun McDonald escribió: > > > >> Having a slightly less efficient import that ensures consistency is a > >> great thing, as it means that the database doesn't grow too quickly. > >> > > > > I fail to see why slower growth is a good thing? > > > Slower (perhaps "steady" is a better word) growth has its advantages for > replication. Osmosis data extraction is fairly efficient and can > extract data many times faster than it is currently added, but > downstream systems can't always process it fast enough. So while it > would be great to be able to import data faster, there probably should > be an upper limit to import speed allow downstream systems to keep up. > This is not a valid reason. Speaking as one of the downstream consumers of the Osmosis diffs we can take it as fast as you can make it. 80n > > Brett > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
