marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:57:02 +0100, Rolf Bode-Meyer <rob...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2009/2/13 Dave Stubbs <osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk>: >> >> >>> It was built against v0.29 of Osmosis which is the version I'm still >>> using -- it should work with that. >>> >>> I hadn't realised the plugin interface had changed. I'll have to take >>> a look some time. >>> The plugin interface itself shouldn't have changed, but the rest of osmosis might have. >> I can't tell if an interface changed but I'm using version 0.30 from >> 2009-01-12 which is http://gweb.bretth.com/osmosis-latest.zip right >> now. So I thought that would be sensible. >> In the meantime I also tried the oldest on Bretts site (0.29.5) but to no >> avail. >> In the absence of an updated plugin, try this. http://gweb.bretth.com/osmosis-0.29.zip > > I recomment we use the plugin-version -attribute to the <requires>-element > to state what version of osmosis we require when writing plugins and that > the version-attribute of the <plugin>-element in corePlugin.xml is kept > up to date with the released version-number of osmosis-releases. > This is the mechanism ment to deal with such issues. > > Brett: for you this means to look at corePlugin.xml when making a new > stable > release > The build scripts already do a search and replace on a few files to update the version number (a java constants file, and the jar manifest from memory). It should be possible to update the plugin xml file as well.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
