On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote: > Eddy Petrișor wrote: >> Stefan de Konink a scris: >>> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>>> Of course this would be a lot of work and discussion in the community, >>>> but I think it's still not too late to do it, and it would help a lot >>>> to bring more structure and logics in the tagging-scheme.
more structure in the tagging scheme might stifle innovation and the ability of non-technical people to extend the taggable features. i think its better to describe the tags which are actually in use, rather than proscribe the tags which are allowed. >>> Still will probably still not render the right icons (aligned) at the >>> same place. Maybe the hole discussion amenity discussion could be solved >>> by going boolean; amenity:hotel = true etc. >> >> This sounds like a good idea until you realise people could tag >> amenity:hotel = no > > highway = no is possible too ;) and highway=hotel, but this is a property of any non-fixed ontology. :-) On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > gastronomy for all kind of beergardens, restaurants, cafes, bars, > fast_food and the like how do i tag my cafe-restaurant or beergarden with a burger bar? it has just the same problems. maybe what we need is an "amenities" tag specifically for multiple co-located amenities? cheers, matt _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
