Maarten Deen wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > >> 2) If we have nothing to hide (we don't), and especially given that > >> nothing about OSM is anonymous, what's with this irrational insistence > >> that anonymity is the standard all the sudden? Does OSM as a project > >> even care or attempt to log who is receiving the data to begin with? > > > > To make things absolutely clear. If any new license will prohibit in any > > way the distribution of the planet without signing or agreeing, this > > bittorrent service will continue anyway as it is now. > > That is no problem, as any future license can only govern any future planet > files. A new license can not go back in time and say "every previous planet > is > illegal to distribute". > To do that and to enforce that needs a whole lot of power, money and > attorneys.
In that case to make it also clear; to submit new Planet files. Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
