2009/6/29 Claudius <[email protected]>: > Am 29.06.2009 23:03, Ed Loach: >>> My 'problem' is that this looks graphically overloaded - think >>> even >>> about footways in several floors! >>> >>> Q1. What about a new tag "indoor=yes" in addition to >>> "highway=footway"? >>> Q2. Renderer (like Mapnik / Osmarender) then chould suppress >>> these footways? >> >> Alternative: new tag highway=corridor, and the routing software >> could then add support for indoor routing? >> >> Ed > > Don't forget surface=carpet/parquetry/tiles/linoleum :P > > Instead of reusing the plaing highway-tag I would favor a new namespace > for indoor features. Sth. along indoor:highway=corridor or > indoor:highway=steps >
The problem that springs to mind, Is shopping centres. Where all the shops are "inside" and the Way is the indoor bit between them. I can also see someone trying to put a road in for a multi-story car park. I think the inside=yes is a good idea. I also think the ways still need rendering if its public, As it means you can walk through the building. Maybe something like the way Landuse gets rendered. Peter. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
