(dang -- I think I may have just sent that wrong -- apologies if you get it twice)
I thought the options were: private: no one but you ever gets to see any of the data (not even totally anonymised) public: data is anonymised, but is otherwise publicly available. is this not right? @john smith: Unfortunately that won't work in this case. The GPS they use lumps several days worth of traces together, I'm not sure why it doesn't split them up based on when it's switched off but that's not happening, this problem could be over come by looking at time stamps but someone has to code something to do that. I've spent quite a while processing gps stuff lately, and may well be able to come up with something, what are the exact parameters of the data and the conditions applied? JR 2009/10/12 John Smith <[email protected]> 2009/10/12 John Robert Peterson <[email protected]>: > > I thought there was fundemental privacy issues with doing any of the > above? > > > > I was under the impression that my traces were totally anonymised, and > that > > no single tracepoint could be linked with any other? -- at least that's > what > > I was lead to believe when I signed up, and provided my data. > > That is the case if you mark them private. If you mark them as public > individual traces can be downloaded. >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
