On 10/11/09 00:09, Matt Amos wrote:

> possibly it's a coincidence, but changeset 3073502 was committed in
> transaction 174978321, which is the txnMax of replication diff 84538.
> i don't see anything special about that number, though.

Ah... I investigated an issue like this a couple of weeks back. I 
suspect there is an off by one error somewhere that means the last 
transaction in each diff isn't getting processed by osmosis when it 
builds the replicate diffs.

I was meaning to talk to Brett about it when he got back...

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes ([email protected])
http://www.compton.nu/

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to