Tom Hughes wrote: > On 10/11/09 00:09, Matt Amos wrote: > >> possibly it's a coincidence, but changeset 3073502 was committed in >> transaction 174978321, which is the txnMax of replication diff 84538. >> i don't see anything special about that number, though. > > Ah... I investigated an issue like this a couple of weeks back. I > suspect there is an off by one error somewhere that means the last > transaction in each diff isn't getting processed by osmosis when it > builds the replicate diffs. That's highly likely :-) The id logic is a bit funky so I might have made some mistakes in there. I'll do my best to take a look at it. Probably won't get to it for a few days though ...
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
