starting to revert now, this will take some time for these huge changesets.
On 3 Apr 2010, at 19:41 , Richard Weait wrote: > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Kenneth Pardue <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looks like I may have run into a serious error trying to figure out the NHD >> data conversion. In trying to merge and upload the data for an entire >> subbasin in order to keep duplicates down, I instead ran into an error in my >> upload at some point during the process, leaving me with nearly 350,000 >> orphaned nodes. o.O Lesson learned, it seems like a much better idea to >> import the files (limited to 30,000 nodes each) individually, and deal with >> duplicates as they happen. >> >> Instead of pushing my luck and working with the revert scripts, how can I >> ask that a system admin revert the following changesets: 4309301, 4309425, >> 4309533, 4309602, 4309662, 4309733, 4309777, 4309834. My mistake certainly >> wasn't a malicious one, I have the genuine intent to improve the quality of >> the maps throughout my state. >> >> Best, >> Kenneth > > Thanks for bringing this to our attention Kenneth. Imports are tricky > and we can all make mistakes. I've forwarded your revert request to > "dev". > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
