Ian Dees <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Peter Budny <[email protected]> wrote: > > Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> writes: > > > But if, as I suspect, your plan was merely to collect everything > > tagged ref=<something> and then stuff that into a route relation > > called <something>, that's not an added value in my book. > > In most cases, these ref=* tags don't exist yet. If we suppose that > it's decided to forget the relations and rely on ref=* tags for > identifying roads as part of a network, I could just as easily shift the > focus to creating the ref=* tags instead. > > How do you plan on determining what ref tags should be applied to a OSM way > and/or relation? Are you assuming that > some key exists in the OSM data that will allow you to reference into the > TIGER data? Are you doing spatial > conflation to match TIGER data with OSM data?
See my other replies in this thread. There's enough metadata in the TIGER imports that a lot of it can be reasonably automated. -- Peter Budny \ Georgia Tech \ CS PhD student \ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
