On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Peter Budny <[email protected]> wrote: > Andy Allan <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Peter Budny <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Relations are the cleaner solution here. You /could/ accomplish the >>> same thing with regular tags, but who wants to see symbol=*, symbol_1=*, >>> symbol_2=*, etc. on every way in a city? (Or worse, a giant symbol=* >>> tag with semicolon-separated URLs?) >> >> Great. So the way to fix this is to first make the data consumed. I'd >> suggest working on osm2pgsql so that it supports route relations >> cleanly, as you've described. Then, you can sit back and let the >> community take advantage of the new rendering system, and implement >> route relations themselves in whichever fashion motivates them the >> most. > > I'd love to work on that... later, when I'm not working > 60-hour weeks trying to graduate. Not right now.
Wait, so you haven't got the time to fix the problem properly, but you've got the time to write and test a bot, and get agreement from all the people who will be affected by it? I think something is wrong here. If you are so short of time, then back away from your automated edits before you break something. Thanks, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
