Scott Crosby <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think what's going on now is that we have a svn repo that git weenies >> don't particularly care for, and no git repo support on osm servers, and >> that people are therefore basically setting up git repos elsewhere for >> various pieces and perhaps not all that concerned about making the svn >> repo be the authoritative source. I believe that the git-svn tools ease >> putting git commits back into svn, so it's probably just as well that >> a git user with svn access use them. >> > > I'm sorry. I didn't intend to trigger this whole event. The only reason I > used git was for my own convenience and that I didn't feel comfortable > asking for a SVN account when I started out. > > I feel the binary code belongs in OSM's authoratitive SVN repository and I > think Stefan's code should merged in with my package.
No worries - this is a useful, civil discusion that I think will be positive for OSM. And I should apologize for being a bit overassuming about what others have done - I meant to characterize general trends rather than any particular person's motivation/action, and my words didn't quite line up with that.
pgpWqbDuU3idA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
