Cool, thanks for sharing the link, I didn't knew it. It's really helpful.
I know that the data in OpenStreetMap may have issues - my questions
simply arrive while I explore the osmosis import in my postgis database.
And I'm one of the issues myself :D because I still learning the
OpenStreetMap data format.
But seeing the discussion that arose from my question concerning
relations and super relations and such this still seems to be an
evolving area ...
Many thanks
Frank
Am 29.10.2010 10:14, schrieb Jochen Topf:
Common. There are many, many broken multipolygon relations. See
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=multipolygon&lon=13.04883&lat=44.58577&zoom=5
Whatever you do with OSM data you have to take into account that its not
perfect and work around that.
Jochen
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 02:48:12PM +0200, Frank Broniewski wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:48:12 +0200
From: Frank Broniewski<[email protected]>
To: Jochen Topf<[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Relation member_roles from Osmosis import
Hello Jochen,
thanks for your answer, that makes it clear. I have another question
about relations.
I found a relation, a lake in Germany, (id=1104680, Schweriner See
(Außensee)), which has serveral inner relations to ways. Some of these
ways form a closed ways, so it's easy to create a polygon from it. But
other ways with the relation role "inner" are not closed, but they form
together an island in the lake.
Should't those form a relation of themselves before relating them to the
lake relation with an inner relation? The ways I am speaking of are
24563810
70191810
70191809
70191807
Luckily those ways form an island but if there would be another island
formed by ways without relating them together it is quite difficult to
recreate them properly. Is this situation an exception or is this a
common situation?
Frank
Am 27.10.2010 11:01, schrieb Jochen Topf:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:39:38AM +0200, Frank Broniewski wrote:
During my examinations from an OSM import (osmosis pbf to postgis) I
found some strange looking entries in the relation_members table. My
goal is to make (GIS) polygons from the linestrings table and therefore
I examined the relations a little closer.
Doing a
select distinct relation_id, member_role from relation_members
I find these entries in the result, which I suspect to be wrong
"relation_id", "member_role"
22852;"forward_stop_0"
22852;"forward_stop_11"
22852;"forward_stop_19"
22852;"forward_stop_9"
22852;"stop_1"
22852;"stop_10"
22852;"stop_12"
22852;"stop_13"
22852;"stop_14"
300710;"backward_stop_%n"
207675;"forward_stop_%n"
I think that numbering the member_role is not the intended way ;-)
Thats a left-over from the time when relation members were not ordered.
Jochen
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
