On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 23:37 +0100, Jon Burgess wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 00:09 +0200, Bernhard Zwischenbrugger wrote: > > On 2011-05-09 11:31, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > 2011/5/9 Bernhard Zwischenbrugger<[email protected]>: > > This building ist rendered correctly: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/58076 > > > > and this > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/11151 > > is not rendered with courtyard. > > > > Where is the difference. > > For some reason the wrong data was being held in the rendering database > for this multipolyon. This happens from time to time and the exact > reason is unclear. There is probably a sequence of edits which fails to > trigger the correct multipolygon handling on osm2pgsql. > > I have manually forced the internal update on this multipolygon and it > seems to have resolved the issue.
Actually this may be a difference in behaviour (or bug) in the recent PBF support of osm2pgsql. The regular XML import code drops all created_by tags but the PBF code does not appear to do this. Since some of your relations have a created_by tag this confuses the code into rendering the outer ring as a building with a complete solid fill instead of treating the multipolygon as the building. Jon _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
