On 19/06/2011 16:05, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/6/19 Tom Hughes<[email protected]>:
On 19/06/11 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
All the logos actually have the same width, but their heights differ
somewhat because they have different aspect ratios.
The main problem is that the descender on the "g" in Google throws off the
vertical centreing and makes that one look badly aligned.
yes, aligning completely different logos in a pleasant way is usually
a difficult task. Same width is not the most important thing, same
font height is much more important (IMO), but then logos also tend to
have different heights in themselfs (besides the g from G, see the
minilogo of wordpress in respect to the writing "wordpress"). Or: AOL
is much more visually intrusive because of the very bold font.
To avoid composition problems you could go for one single horizontal
line with all of them (or one column) In either way they would have to
become smaller (not a problem).
The way JanRain Engage (which is a ready made implementation of
more-or-less the same thing) does this is by putting the logos on equal
size buttons. This is nice and neat and has the added advantage of
making it clear that if you click on them it does something:
http://www.janrain.com/products/engage/social-login
David
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
