Hi.
Why should that prevent errors in software not handling 64bit ids correctly?
I don't think any software requires all possible ids in between to exist
- even for the whole planet.
So it's not different wether 2147483647 is missing or 42.
regards
Peter
Am 20.07.2012 14:19, schrieb Andrew:
Would it be a good idea if the next node allocated after 2147483646 is node
2147483648? It would mean that applications expecting 32-bit node numbers fail
cleanly and stops buggy editing software from modifying the wrong node.
--
Andrew
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
