Andrew wrote:
Would it be a good idea if the next node allocated after 2147483646 is node 2147483648? It would mean that applications expecting 32-bit node numbers fail cleanly and stops buggy editing software from modifying the wrong node.
Not that far away now, I guess (I added 1831586714 last night). I doubt that everything expecting 32-bit numbers will fail cleanly though!
Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
