Hey, I haven't seen anything specifically rulling it out, but would I be right > in saying that mapbox don't have plans to contribute to P2?
No current plans, though that's more for lack of any experience in Flash & Flex than anything set in stone or technical. Given that we currently don't plan to have some kind of "P2 beater" that takes its place in the edit tab, it might make a lot of sense to take a closer look at doing some targeted improvements of it. Thanks for your input! I had also totally forgotten about the deleted map item call - that should totally be on the list. Tom On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Andy Allan <gravityst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 October 2012 00:58, Tom MacWright <t...@macwright.org> wrote: > > Hey all (or, well, those subscribed to dev@ - my flamewar shields are > at 50% > > so I'm not risking an email to talk), > > Bear in mind that technical (generally software) stuff is often better > on dev@ anyway - and there's lots of developers on this list who > aren't subscribed to the general flamewar^Wtalk@ list. > > > The three of these were closed by Tom Hughes, which is fine - they might > be > > all bad ideas, and if we're treating the issue tracker as "Stuff we all > > agree is definitely good", then they don't belong there: they're > relatively > > undiscussed ideas, since I had just posted them. > > We have rails-dev@ was the place to discuss matters relating to the > api/website, and here for matters with a wider impact. Does discussing > new ideas on github bring advantages over mailing lists that I'm > missing? It's not something that I'm used to. > > > What do you want to see happen with OSM's software this year? What are > the > > tasks which everyone agrees on, but nobody has had the time to tackle? > > Ah, good stuff. > > There's a lot of stuff on Potlatch2 that I'd like to see, but that I > don't have time to work on. There's a junction editor that needs > writing, an in-editor tutorial framework that needs finishing off, and > a lot of half-done stuff in translations, UI and unit testing. I > haven't seen anything specifically rulling it out, but would I be > right in saying that mapbox don't have plans to contribute to P2? > > Beyond that, I'd like to see the issues around the > deleted-item-map-call sorted out, and OWL (or equivalent) integrated > into the rails port to power the history tab. As for all-new things, > I'd like to explore how to integrate all the various QA feeds into a > combined overview, rather than having to hunt around different sites. > > Cheers, > Andy >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
