This should be conversation over whether we should link to iD or embed it, not a derail into opinions and feature requests.
As far as linking to iD: I think we should focus on the pull request to include iD on the site https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/225 rather than linking to it in the short-term. The pull request is very close to being complete. Kimaido: the presence/absence of an 'advanced mode' has been discussed at length in the iD tracker * https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/759 * https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1181 * https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1278 In short, we would rather have one UI that works decently for everyone rather than splintering it into 'easy' and 'advanced' modes. For super-advanced editing, there will always be JOSM. iD does handle relations, though it does not support a relations editing UI at the moment: search for 'relations' in the issue tracker and the commits. There has been a ton of work on the existing relations support, how it interacts with pre-existing relations, and plans for simpler interfaces for editing relations. Yes: iD has room to grow. But I don't think that the 'a front page editor must include X feature that I think is important' is a useful criteria. If you ask whether an editor has been tested, used, deployed, and generally regarded as safe, iD fits that goal. Tom On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2013/4/22 kimaidou <kimai...@gmail.com> > >> Hi all >> >> I am following this discussion about ID. I think I won't use ID but keep >> Potlach as long as ID does not integrate an "advanced" view for "power" >> users. I use Potlach a lot to do some quick additions, and I always use >> preselections then switch to the advanced tab to control which tags/values >> are used and to add some specific tags. >> >> I have probably missed the same feature in ID ? >> >> > > > +1, a full editor promoted on the main page as one of the principal > editors should IMHO display the tags and not just an interpretation of > them. Also it seems as if iD doesn't handle relations yet, at least it > seems to have problems in recognizing multipolygon relations. > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
