Hi Peter, Please read the previous posts and the linked tickets. Here's the one for you: https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1181
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Peter Wendorff <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi. > > As far as I see it's entirely possible to add free tags (there's an > expand link/button that shows other tags). > But IMHO it's not enough, because that only shows tags that are not > included elsewhere in the presetted tag stuff. > The problem with this is, that for the presetted stuff it's (or at least > seems to be) impossible to get the raw tags out of it, preventing to > learn them (yes, novice mappers should not have to, but IMHO they should > be able to understand the raw tags). > > So this tag list should IMHO show all tags, not only those not exposed > already by even more human readable UI translations. > > regards > Peter > > > Am 22.04.2013 16:50, schrieb Tom MacWright: > > Hi Martin, > > > >> it seems as if doesn't expose way membership to the user currently. In > > any area with multipolygons or turn restrictions or, likely more > difficult > > to fix, other types or relations, mappers will really break a lot without > > even being able to notice. > > > > It doesn't expose relations in the UI, but does not break them and makes > > the same relatively smart choices as P2 when users make operations on > ways > > and nodes in relations. > > > > "break a lot" is unfounded and untrue: users have been testing iD for > weeks > > now and we are not seeing significant problems from this approach. > > > >> +1 in case of feature X, but freeform tagging is one of the key features > > that really make osm what it is > > > > What's the assertion here, that iD doesn't support freeform tagging? > That's > > entirely incorrect: read the issues and look at the user interface. iD > > supports freeform tagging: just click 'other' and use the tags UI if you > > don't want to use presets. > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 22/apr/2013, at 16:25, Tom MacWright <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> For super-advanced editing, there will always be JOSM. > >>> > >>> iD does handle relations, though it does not support a relations > editing > >> UI at the moment: search for 'relations' in the issue tracker and the > >> commits. There has been a ton of work on the existing relations support, > >> how it interacts with pre-existing relations, and plans for simpler > >> interfaces for editing relations. > >> > >> > >> it seems as if doesn't expose way membership to the user currently. In > any > >> area with multipolygons or turn restrictions or, likely more difficult > to > >> fix, other types or relations, mappers will really break a lot without > even > >> being able to notice. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Yes: iD has room to grow. But I don't think that the 'a front page > >> editor must include X feature that I think is important' is a useful > >> criteria. If you ask whether an editor has been tested, used, deployed, > and > >> generally regarded as safe, iD fits that goal. > >> > >> > >> +1 in case of feature X, but freeform tagging is one of the key features > >> that really make osm what it is > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Martin > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
