As evident in the discussion on issue https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1446 there are several people interested in maintaining functionality that existed only a few days ago - being able to view single tiles just as easily as before.

A patch was submitted which added the tile to the new context menu (which in itself is a fine addition but eliminated the functionality being discussed). See https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/1450

It was closed and rejected in a very abrupt and unconstructive manner.

The issue itself was also closed with accusation of brigading.

However what was most aberrant there was the assertion "If you want something to show tile status then fine. I might even agree to an option to get the tile URL or expire a tile (though the latter is perhaps unlikely) but it needs to be properly integrated, not just dumping the URL in another tab and letting the user fiddle with it."

As the issue is closed to non-collaborators I don't find any other place to bring this up than here. Every person who has put their name to the discussions, for and against, has done tremendous work for OpenStreetMap - that is never in doubt.

But removing functionality and then denying it to be re-added based on very little but personal objective is unhelpful and detrimental.

What should have been a great patch with addition of context menu is turning into an issue because of one very simple change and resistance to tweaking it.

Denigrating active mappers because they are "the 0.001%" of the user base is hardly a solid reason - nor is "what makes good UX for the 99% not what will make the 1% a little happier".

Did the default map suddenly become a commercial entity overnight which thinks of margins and market share? If so I'd like to see the result of the A/B testing that validated removing the functionality of viewing tiles directly.



--Jói / Stalfur

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to