oh I misinterpreted the sentence. It's fine how it is. Ethan
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:19:02PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> > Another approach, which had not occurred to me before now, would be to >> > use "true" as the default if a schema does not have any tables with >> > "isRoot" explicitly specified (for compatibility), and "false" >> > otherwise. Do you like that better? If you do, then I will implement >> > it that way instead. >> >> If it's relatively easy to do that sounds like a good idea to me. I'd >> prefer the default do the right thing if possible. If it's too much >> work I wouldn't bother though, we can always change it later if it >> becomes a problem. We don't add tables that often anyways. > > It's not much work. > >> > + the <ref table="Open_vSwitch"/> table are automatically deleted >> > + from the database, except for records in a few distinguished >> > + ``root set'' tables noted below. >> > + </p> >> >> The diff looks good. I made a minor comment about the wording of the >> above sentence which you may not have noticed: >> I would phrase this as "except for a few records in a distinguished" >> >> I'm not married to that wording so if you think it's fine how it is >> just mention it. > > Oh, I missed that part. > > I don't understand why the "few" would be moved from "tables" to > "records". Can you explain? > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
